Toast,
tsunamis and the really big one | Chris Goldfinger | TEDxMtHood
– TEDx
Mega Tsunami (scenes from the film - Haeundae 2009) 1080p
Now, I have watched the whole original Korean movie three times, and never I did I see, even once, Hollywood's acknowledgment that they stole the entire movie to make San Andreas, the cast of characters, the lines, slightly modified roles, indeed, the entire plot was stolen. Still Hollywood put up their usual warning at the beginning of San Andreas (2015) “Piracy is not a victimless crime' compare that with Haeundae {2009). If I were King, I would have the Rock brought up on charges. Let's see: he was paid by, trained and became a local hero in LA, where he abandoned his post, left the scene to go north to San Francisco, stole the LA helicopter, stole gas all along the way north, stole boats and whatever he wanted. OFF their heads; writers, directors, producers and actors, all, except Alexandra Daddario and the two brothers she was with. They at least had some class. The movie is so scientifically wrong at so many levels it becomes a charade,, a
farce, pantomime, travesty, mockery, parody, pretense, act, masquerade |
The first responder in Korea is my hero; he gave his life to help others.
https://youtu.be/2QEEyiB3g8k [6:49 minutes]
>>>>>>>>>>
Cascadia New Paradigm Shift in Red; old terminology in Black.
At
depths shallower than 30 km (19 mi) or so, the Cascadia zone is
locked by friction while strain slowly builds up as
the rising North American Plate climbs up the back of the subducting
Pacific Plates
[subduction forces act], until the fault's frictional strength is
exceeded and the rocks slip past each other along the fault in a
megathrust
earthquake.
Below 30 km (19 mi) the plate interface exhibits episodic
tremor and slip.
In
Canada, sometimes referred to as 'cluster events'.
The width of the Cascadia subduction zone varies along its length,
depending
on The North American Tectonic Plate's angle
of attack.
[In fluid dynamics, angle of attack is the angle between a reference
line on a body and the vector representing the relative motion
between the body and the fluid through which it is moving. Angle of
attack is the angle between the body's reference line and the
oncoming flow. ~ Wikipedia]
At depth The North American Plate is hot, possibly XXXº. We all
know that the earth gets hotter the deeper you go. For instance,
when the Bralorne
- Pioneer
[Gold] Mine was closed in 1972, the men were working on the face, at
.
The
Pioneer property was consolidated with Bralorne Mines in 1959.
That
was just up the mountain from where I lived in Minto
[in the old definition; depending on the angle of the subducted
oceanic plate, which heats up as it is pushed deeper beneath the
continent. As the edge of the plate sinks and becomes hotter and more
molten, the subducting rock eventually loses the ability to store
mechanical stress; earthquakes
may result. On the Hyndman and Wang diagram (not shown, click on
reference link below) the "locked" zone is storing up
energy for an earthquake, and the "transition" zone,
although somewhat plastic, could probably rupture.[9]]
The Cascadia subduction zone runs from triple junctions at its north and south ends. To the north, just below Haida Gwaii, it intersects the Haida Gwaii Fault [formerly, the Queen Charlotte Fault] and the Explorer Ridge. To the south, just off of Cape Mendocino in California, it intersects the San Andreas Fault and the Mendocino Fracture Zoneat the Mendocino Triple Junction.
Megathrust earthquakes are the most powerful earthquakes known to occur, and can exceed magnitude 9.0. They occur when enough energy (stress) has accumulated in the "locked" zone of the fault to cause a rupture known as a megathrust earthquake. The magnitude of a megathrust earthquake is proportional to length of the rupture along the fault. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, which forms the boundary between the Juan de Fuca and North American plates, is a very long sloping fault that stretches from mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California.[10]
Because of the great length of the fault, the Cascadia Subduction Zone is capable of producing very large earthquakes if rupture occurs along its entire length. Thermal and deformation studies indicate that the region 60 kilometers (about 40 miles) downdip (east) of the deformation front (where plate deformation begins) is fully locked (the plates do not move past each other). Further downdip, there is a transition from fully locked to aseismic sliding.[10]
In 1999, a group of Continuous Global Positioning System sites registered a brief reversal of motion of approximately 2 centimeters (0.8 inches) over a 50 kilometer by 300 kilometer (about 30 mile by 200 mile) area. The movement was the equivalent of a 6.7 magnitude earthquake.[11] The motion did not trigger an earthquake and was only detectable as silent, non-earthquake seismic signatures.[12]
In 2004, a study conducted by the Geological Society of America analyzed the potential for land subsidence along the Cascadia subduction zone. It postulated that several towns and cities on the west coast of Vancouver Island, such as Tofino and Ucluelet, are at risk for a sudden, earthquake initiated, 1–2 m subsidence.[13]
San Andreas Fault connection[edit]
Studies of past earthquake traces on both the northern San Andreas Fault and the southern Cascadia subduction zone indicate a correlation in time which may be evidence that quakes on the Cascadia subduction zone may have triggered most of the major quakes on the northern San Andreas during at least the past 3,000 years or so. The evidence also shows the rupture direction going from north to south in each of these time-correlated events. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake seems to have been a major exception to this correlation, however, as it was not preceded by a major Cascadia quake.[14]
The Cascadia Subduction Zone (CSZ) is a 1,000 km (620 mi) long dipping fault that stretches from Northern Vancouver Island to Cape Mendocino in northern California. It separates the Juan de Fuca and North America plates. New Juan de Fuca plate is created offshore along the Juan de Fuca Ridge.[7][8]
The Juan de Fuca Tectonic Plate moves eastward, toward, and eventually is shoved beneath, the continent North American Tectonic Plate? (A better way to state this, for clearer understanding, would be to state that the western moving North American Tectonic Plate butts up against the Pacific Plates, and rises above them. evidenced by the GPS mapping of mountain peaks rising, from the Olympic Peninsula in Washington State all the way north to the mountains north-west of Campbell River. RISING MOUNTAINS are NOT A GOOD THING. Eventually, they will DROP back down, most likely in five to twelve minutes, during the Cascadia Megaquake). In between five to twelve minutes, the North American west coast will all drop down one to three metres. Places like Chesterman Beach and Long Beach in British Columbia will liquefy and Tofino and Ucluelet, BC will also drop down one – three metres, below the level of the Pacific Ocean. In addition, the incoming Megatsunami as a result of the Cascadia Megaquake could be 12 stories (120 feet) high.
The North American Tectonic Plate only surfaces offshore about 80 kilometre, under the Pacific Ocean at what has been called the Cascadia Subduction Zone, The zone separates the Juan de Fuca Plate, Explorer Plate, Gorda Plate, and North American Plate. Here, the oceanic crust of the Pacific Ocean has been sinking beneath the continent for about 200 million years, and currently does so at a rate of approximately 40 mm/yr.[7][8] “Sinking beneath the continent mis-characterizes and does not lead to greater clarity”. My opinion, starting about 200 kilometres east of the 'Cascadia Fault' and about 160 kilometres inland to the east, the western moving North American Tectonic Plate butts up against the Pacific Plates, and rises above them.
At depths shallower than 30 km (19 mi) or so, the Cascadia zone is locked by friction while strain slowly builds up as the subduction forces act, until the fault's frictional strength is exceeded and the rocks slip past each other along the fault in a megathrust earthquake. Below 30 km (19 mi) the plate interface exhibits episodic tremor and slip.
The width of the Cascadia subduction zone varies along its length, depending on the angle of the subducted oceanic plate, which heats up as it is pushed deeper beneath the continent. As the edge of the plate sinks and becomes hotter and more molten, the subducting rock eventually loses the ability to store mechanical stress; earthquakes may result. On the Hyndman and Wang diagram (not shown, click on reference link below) the "locked" zone is storing up energy for an earthquake, and the "transition" zone, although somewhat plastic, could probably rupture.[9]
The Cascadia subduction zone runs from triple junctions at its north and south ends. To the north, just below Haida Gwaii, it intersects the Queen Charlotte Fault and the Explorer Ridge. To the south, just off of Cape Mendocino in California, it intersects the San Andreas Fault and the Mendocino Fracture Zone at the Mendocino Triple Junction.
Cascadia earthquake sources
Earthquake effects[edit]
Megathrust earthquakes are the most powerful earthquakes known to occur, and can exceed magnitude9.0. They occur when enough energy (stress) has accumulated in the "locked" zone of the fault to cause a rupture known as a megathrust earthquake. The magnitude of a megathrust earthquake is proportional to length of the rupture along the fault. The Cascadia Subduction Zone, which forms the boundary between the Juan de Fuca and North American plates, is a very long sloping fault that stretches from mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California.[10]
Because of the great length of the fault, the Cascadia Subduction Zone is capable of producing very large earthquakes if rupture occurs along its entire length. Thermal and deformation studies indicate that the region 60 kilometers (about 40 miles) downdip (east) of the deformation front (where plate deformation begins) is fully locked (the plates do not move past each other). Further downdip, there is a transition from fully locked to a seismic sliding.[10]
In 1999, a group of Continuous Global Positioning System sites registered a brief reversal of motion of approximately 2 centimeters (0.8 inches) over a 50 kilometer by 300 kilometer (about 30 mile by 200 mile) area. The movement was the equivalent of a 6.7 magnitude earthquake.[11] The motion did not trigger an earthquake and was only detectable as silent, non-earthquake seismic signatures.[12]
In 2004, a study conducted by the Geological Society of America analyzed the potential for land subsidence along the Cascadia subduction zone. It postulated that several towns and cities on the west coast of Vancouver Island, such as Tofino and Ucluelet, are at risk for a sudden, earthquake initiated, 1–2 m subsidence.[13]
San Andreas Fault connection[edit]
Studies of past earthquake traces on both the northern San Andreas Fault and the southern Cascadia subduction zone indicate a correlation in time which may be evidence that quakes on the Cascadia subduction zone may have triggered most of the major quakes on the northern San Andreas during at least the past 3,000 years or so. The evidence also shows the rupture direction going from north to south in each of these time-correlated events. The 1906 San Francisco earthquake seems to have been a major exception to this correlation, however, as it was not preceded by a major Cascadia quake.[14]
Earthquake timing[edit]
Great earthquakes
estimated year |
interval |
|
---|---|---|
2005 source[15] |
2003 source[16] |
(years) |
about 9 pm, January 26, 1700 (NS) |
780 |
|
780–1190 CE |
880–960 CE |
210 |
690–730 CE |
550–750 CE |
330 |
350–420 CE |
250–320 CE |
910 |
660-440 BCE |
610–450 BCE |
400 |
980–890 BCE |
910–780 BCE |
250 |
1440–1340 BCE |
1150–1220 BCE |
unknown |
There is also evidence of accompanying tsunamis with every earthquake. One strong line of evidence for these earthquakes is convergent timings for fossil damage from tsunamis in the Pacific Northwest and historical Japanese records of tsunamis.[18]
The next rupture of the Cascadia Subduction Zone is anticipated to be capable of causing widespread destruction throughout the Pacific Northwest.[19]
Forecasts of the next major earthquake[edit]
See also: 1700 Cascadia earthquake § Future threats
Prior to the 1980s, scientists thought that the subduction zone did not generate earthquakes like other subduction zones around the world, but research by Brian Atwater and Kenji Satake tied together evidence of a large tsunami on the Washington coast with documentation of an orphan tsunami in Japan (a tsunami without an associated earthquake). The two pieces of the puzzle were linked, and they then realized that the subduction zone was more hazardous than previously suggested.
In 2009, some geologists predicted a 10% to 14% probability that the Cascadia Subduction Zone will produce an event of magnitude 9.0 or higher in the next 50 years.[20] In 2010, studies suggested that the risk could be as high as 37% for earthquakes of magnitude 8.0 or higher[21][22]
Geologists and civil engineers have broadly determined that the Pacific Northwest region is not well prepared for such a colossal earthquake. The earthquake is expected to be similar to the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami, because the rupture is expected to be as long as the 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami. The resulting tsunami might reach heights of approximately 30 meters (100 ft).[20] FEMA estimates some 13,000 fatalities from such an event, with another 27,000 injured. It predicts that a million people will be displaced, with yet another 2.5 million requiring food and water. An estimated 1/3 of public safety workers will not respond to the disaster due to a collapse in infrastructure and a desire to ensure the safety of themselves and their loved ones.[6] Other analyses predict that even a magnitude 6.7 earthquake in Seattle would result in 7,700 dead and injured, $33 billion in damages, 39,000 buildings largely or totally destroyed, and 130 simultaneous fires.[4]
The Cascade Volcanic Arc is a continental volcanic arc that extends from northern California to the coastal mountains of British Columbia.[1] The arc consists of a series of Quaternary age stratovolcanoes that grew on top of pre-existing geologic materials that ranged from Miocenevolcanics to glacial ice.[1] The Cascade Volcanic arc is located approximately 100 km inland from the coast, and forms a north-to-south chain of peaks that average over 3,000 m (10,000 ft) in elevation.[1] The major peaks from south to north include:
Lassen Peak and Mt. Shasta (California)
Crater Lake (Mazama), Three Sisters, Mt. Jefferson, Mt. Hood(Oregon)
Mt. Adams, Mount St. Helens, Mt. Rainier, Glacier Peak, Mt. Baker (Washington)
Mt. Garibaldi and Mt. Meager massif (British Columbia)
The most active volcanoes in the chain include Mount St. Helens, Mt. Baker, Lassen Peak, and Mt. Hood. St. Helens captured worldwide attention when it erupted catastrophically in 1980.[1] St. Helens continues to rumble, albeit more quietly, emitting occasional steam plumes and experiencing small earthquakes, both signs of continuing magmatic activity.[1]
Most of the volcanoes have a main, central vent from which the most recent eruptions have occurred. The peaks are composed of layers of solidified andesitic to dacitic magma, and the more siliceous (and explosive) rhyolite.
The volcanoes above the subduction zone include:
See also[edit]
References[edit] [some of the hyperlinks here are old 'stale-dated' and do not work]
^ Jump up to:a b c d e f "Cascadia Subduction Zone Volcanism in British Columbia". Archived from the original on 2010-06-02. Retrieved 2008-12-18. USGS
^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g Stefan Lovgren (8 December 2003). "Did North American Quake Cause 1700 Japanese Tsunami?". National Geographic. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b c d e f "Ghosts of Tsunamis Past". American Museum of Natural History. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b c d e f Kevin Krajick (March 2005). "Future Shocks: Modern science, ancient catastrophes and the endless quest to predict earthquakes". Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b c d e f g h Jerry Thompson (13 March 2012). "The Giant, Underestimated Earthquake Threat to North America". Discover Magazine. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b c d e Schulz, Kathryn (July 20, 2015). "The Really Big One: An earthquake will destroy a sizable portion of the coastal Northwest. The question is when". The New Yorker. Retrieved July 14, 2015.
^ Jump up to:a b "Juan de Fuca Volcanics". Retrieved 2008-05-06. USGS
^ Jump up to:a b Alt, David D.; Hyndman, Donald W. (1978). Roadside Geology of Oregon (19th ed.). Missoula, Montana: Mountain Press. p. 3. ISBN 0-87842-063-0.
Jump up^ "Hyndman and Wang". Archived from the original on 2010-05-30. Retrieved 2009-12-17. USGS (dead link) See fig. 5 herefor the diagram.
^ Jump up to:a b Nedimović, Mladen R.; Hyndman, Roy D.; Ramachandran, Kumar; Spence, George D. (24 July 2003). "Reflection signature of seismic and aseismic slip on the northern Cascadia subduction interface". Nature. 424 (6947): 416–420. Bibcode:2003Natur.424..416N. doi:10.1038/nature01840. PMID 12879067.
Jump up^ Dragert, Herb; Wang, Kelin; James, Thomas S. (25 May 2001). "A silent slip event on the deeper Cascadia subduction interface". Science. 292 (5521): 1525–1528. Bibcode:2001Sci...292.1525D. doi:10.1126/science.1060152. PMID 11313500.
Jump up^ Rogers, Garry; Dragert, Herb (20 June 2003). "Episodic tremor and slip on the Cascadia subduction zone: the chatter of silent slip". Science. 300 (5627): 1942–1943. Bibcode:2003Sci...300.1942R. doi:10.1126/science.1084783. PMID 12738870.
Jump up^ Leonard, Lucinda J.; Hyndman, Roy D.; Mazzotti, Stéphane. "Coseismic subsidence in the 1700 great Cascadia earthquake: Coastal estimates versus elastic dislocation models". GSA Bulletin. 116 (5–6): 655–670. Bibcode:2004GSAB..116..655L. doi:10.1130/B25369.1.
Jump up^ Brian F Atwater; Musumi-Rokkaku Satoko; Satake Kenji; Tsuji Yoshinobu; Ueda Kazue; David K Yamaguchi (2005). The Orphan Tsunami of 1700 — Japanese Clues to a Parent Earthquake in North America (PDF) (U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1707 ed.). Seattle and London: University of Washington Press. p. 100 (timeline diagram). ISBN 0-295-98535-6.
Jump up^ Brian F Atwater; Martitia P Tuttle; Eugene S Schweig; Charles M Rubin; David K Yamaguchi; Eileen Hemphill-Haley (2003). "Earthquake Recurrence Inferred from Paleoseismology" (PDF). Developments in Quaternary Science. Elsevier BV. 1. Figures 10 and 11 (pp 341, 342); article pp 331–350. doi:10.1016/S1571-0866(03)01015-7. ISSN 1571-0866. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2012-03-19. Retrieved 2011-03-15.
Jump up^ "Cascadia Subduction Zone". Pacific Northwest Seismic Network.
Jump up^ "The Orphan Tsunami of 1700—Japanese Clues to a Parent Earthquake in North America" (PDF). Retrieved 2008-05-06.USGS Professional Paper 1707
Jump up^ "Cascade Range Earthquake Workgroup – Magnitude 9 scenario" (PDF).
^ Jump up to:a b Tobias, Lori (April 19, 2009). "Big earthquake coming sooner than we thought, Oregon geologist says". The Oregonian.
Jump up^ Lovett, Richard A. (31 May 2010). "Risk of giant quake off American west coast goes up". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2010.270. Retrieved 2010-06-08.
Jump up^ "Odds are about 1-in-3 that mega-earthquake will hit Pacific Northwest in next 50 years, scientists say" (Press release). Oregon State University. May 25, 2010 – via Science Daily.
External links [edit]
Chris Goldfinger; C. Hans Nelson; Ann E. Morey; Joel E. Johnson; Jason R. Patton; Eugene Karabanov; Julia Gutiérrez-Pastor; Andrew T. Eriksson; Eulàlia Gràcia; Gita Dunhill; Randolph J. Enkin; Audrey Dallimore; Tracy Vallier (2012). Robert Kayen, ed. "Turbidite event history—Methods and implications for Holocene paleoseismicity of the Cascadia subduction zone". U.S. Geological Survey. Professional Paper 1661–F.
Atwater, BF (1987). "Evidence for great Holocene earthquakes along the outer coast of Washington State". Science. 236(4804): 942–44. Bibcode:1987Sci...236..942A. doi:10.1126/science.236.4804.942. PMID 17812748.
"Cascadia Peril '09" at dailywireless.org
9.0 Shakemap Scenario - M 9.0 Scenario Earthquake - Cascadia M9.0 Scenario (mean ...
https://earthquake.usgs.gov › scenarios › eventpage
Sep. 20, 2011 — M 9.0 Scenario Earthquake - Cascadia M9.0 Scenario (mean value) ... More information about scenarios ... ShakeMap Intensity Thumbnail ..
No comments:
Post a Comment